1-Oct-02 0:00 AM CST
Utilization of Orthopaedic Services in a Capitated Population
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 84-A, No. 11, November 2002
Author: M.R. Brinker, MD, Daniel P. O'Conner, MS, PT, ATC, Peggy Pierce, BBA, B. William Woods, MD, and Marc N. Elliott, PhD
Click here to read the entire published article by Dr Brinker
Background: The utilization rate for orthopaedic services (office visits and surgery) is not well known. The purposeof this study was to determine the utilization rates for orthopaedic office visits and surgical procedures ina large population of captured lives.
Methods: The study population comprised an average of 134,902 persons per month who were enrolled undera capitated insurance plan between January 1999 and December 1999. This plan was serviced by an independentphysician association of sixty-two orthopaedic surgeons who were responsible for all orthopaedic care.Data were collected prospectively and stored in a centralized database. All analyses were conducted with useof monthly averages. Poisson regression was used to compare utilization rates and to calculate odds ratios in order to determine whether the utilization rates varied by age and gender.
Results: The highest proportions of office visits were due to fractures (21%), osteoarthritis (4%), meniscaltears (4%), and low-back pain or sciatica (4%). Knee arthroscopy (30%), foot and ankle procedures (10%), and spine procedures (9%) accounted for the highest proportions of surgical procedures. The overall utilizationrates were 6.96 office visits and 1.99 surgical procedures per 1000 covered lives per month. Across all age groups, males and females did not differ with respect to the utilization rate for office visits (p = 0.42) or surgery (p = 0.09). Increased age was significantly related to increased utilization rates for office visits (p ≤ 0.0002) and surgery (p ≤ 0.002).
Conclusions: These data may be used to determine the size of a capitated population that an orthopaedic practice can accommodate, to determine the number of orthopaedic providers that is needed to provide services for a capitated population, and to estimate the expenses associated with providing orthopaedic services for a capitated population in an orthopaedic practice.
Click a star to rate!
Rating: 0.00 / 5.00
-
0 ratings
Source: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 84-A, No. 11, November 2002
Related Documents:
JBJS_Utilization_rprnt.pdf 206.729 KB
Content Tags: bone •
Other Recent Articles:
- Case Report Calcaneogenesis 1-May-09
- Management of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty 1-Mar-08
- Ilizarov Distraction Before Revision Hip Arthroplasty After Resection Arthroplasty With Profound Limb Shortening 1-Jan-08
- Outcomes of Tibial Nonunion in Older Adults Following Treatment Using the Ilizarov Method 1-Oct-07
- Metabolic and Endocrine Abnormalities in Patients With Nonunions 1-Sep-07
- Ilizarov Treatment of Infected Nonunions of the Distal Humerus After Failure of Internal Fixation: An Outcomes Study 1-Mar-07
- Payer Type Has Little Effect on Operative Rate and Surgeons’ Work Intensity 1-Oct-06
- Nonunions of the Femoral Shaft and Distal Femur 11-Aug-06
- CT Scan Helps Delineate Cervical Osteoid Osteoma and Atypical Nidus 17-Sep-05
- IIizarov Correction of Malrotated Femoral Shaft Fracture Initially Treated With an Intramedullary Nail: A Case Report 17-Sep-04
Return to the Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon Articles Search Page