Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon Article RSS http://drbrinker.com Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon Article RSS feed. . Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon http://drbrinker.com/tresources/en/images/icons/tendenci34x15.gif http://drbrinker.com no Copyright 2005, Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon Tendenci Membership Management Software by Schipul - The Web Marketing Company en-us noemail@drbrinker.com Tue, 07 Apr 2015 22:29:48 GMT Articles http://drbrinker.com/en/art/296/ <br> <h2>The American Journal of Orthopedics&nbsp;</h2> <h3>Stephen W. Dailey, MD, Mark R. Brinker, MD, and Marc N. Elliott, PhD</h3> <p>Click here to read the entire <a target="_blank" href="/attachments/articles/296/Orthopedic Residents' Perceptions of the Content and Adequacy of Their Residency Training .pdf">published article by Dr. Brinker</a></p> <br> <hr /> <div align="justify">&nbsp;&nbsp; The content and adequacy of orthopedic surgery residency training Can be evaluated by several means. Residency programs must comply with certain standards outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee. If programs meet these standards, the curriculum and training offered are considered adequate and the program is accredited. Individual residents can measure their progress and training by periodic faculty evaluations required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and by the standardized Orthopaedic In·Training Examination, which is administered yearly by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Ultimately, the individual resident's performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board Certification Examination is a reflection of the adequacy of his or her residency training experience. Another method of evaluating the training and experience of orthopedic residents is to ask them directly how they perceive the content and ade. quacy of their residency training. A questionnaire was sent to all 698 graduating orthopedic surgery residents listed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1996 graduates) to determine how they assess their orthopedic training. </div> <br><br>17-Sep-98 4:00 PM Orthopedic Residents' Perceptions of the Content and Adequacy of Their Residency Training The American Journal of Orthopedics Stephen W. Dailey, MD, Mark R. Brinker, MD, and Marc N. Elliott, PhD Click here to read the entire published article by Dr. Brinker The content and adequacy of orthopedic surgery residency training Can be evaluated by several means. Residency programs must comply with certain standards outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee. If programs meet these standards, the curriculum and training offered are considered adequate and the program is accredited. Individual residents can measure their progress and training by periodic faculty evaluations required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and by the standardized Orthopaedic In·Training Examination, which is administered yearly by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Ultimately, the individual resident's performance on the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board Certification Examination is a reflection of the adequacy of his or her residency training experience. Another method of evaluating the training and experience of orthopedic residents is to ask them directly how they perceive the content and ade. quacy of their residency training. A questionnaire was sent to all 698 graduating orthopedic surgery residents listed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1996 graduates) to determine how they assess their orthopedic training. no http://drbrinker.com/en/art/296/ Thu, 17 Sep 1998 21:00:00 GMT