An Analysis of the actual cost of Tibial Nonunions

Tue, 16 Sep 1997 20:00:00 GMT

The Journal of the Louisiana State, Vol. 149, June 1997

Author: Richard Beaver, BA; Mark R. Brinker, MD; Robert L. Barrack, MD

Click here to read the entire published article by Dr Brinker

For each patient the total hospital charges and costs were determined using Hermann Hospital's knowledge-based computer system. In addition, fat each total cost of a patient admission or an outpatient visit we were able to divide the total cost into 16 different cost centers (such as routine nursing or radiology). This division enabled w to evaluate where the majority of the monetary resources for tibial shaft nonunions were being consumed. The average total accrual cost of treating a nonunion was $11,333. Approximately 83% percent of that figure is accounted for by central services, nursing care, and the operating and recovery rooms.

In an environment of increased awareness over the cost of medical care more attention is focused on the actual cost of treatment. The use of a knowledge-based computer system, such as Transition System Incorporated, allows administrators and care givers an improved understanding of where the actual costs and charges originate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs associated with tibial shaft fracture nonunions.

Other studies have evaluated the social and economic impact associated with various modalities of treatment of lower extremity injuries. However. to the best of our knowledge. no study has attempted to assess the origin of the fiscal costs accompanying a severe lower extremity injury leading to a tibial nonunion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
We performed a retrospective review of the financial and medical records of 11 patients who were initially treated at our institution between October 1991 and September 1994 for a tibial shaft fracture and subsequently presented with a tibial nonunion. We defined a nonunion as a tibial shaft fracture without radiographic or clinical evidence of progressive healing 6 months after the initial injury. In determining me costs used in this study the authors totaled any inpatient or outpatient costs beginning 6 months after the initial injury. This was done in order to minimize me inc1wion of money spent on concominant injuries (78% of patients in this review had a concominant injury). The authors are aware of the debate as to when fractures could be classified as nonunions. The authors acknowledge that treatment of potential nonunions should be aggressive, often beginning within 6 months of the initial injury. However, the authors lacked the means by which to differentiate treatment costs specifically for nonunions and costs for other injuries; therefore reeaunent COsts within 6 months after the initial injury were not included.. At the most recent follow-up, a total of 9 patients had financial and medical records available for evaluation; 2 patients were lost to follow-up.

Analysis of data in this retrospective study was based upon information obtained through a thorough review of the medical and financial records of the patients. A knowledge-based computer system developed by TSI (Transition Systems, Inc:. Boston. Mass.) generated the financial data used in this study. Using financial and clinical information. this cost accounting system may be used to determine the actual cost of procedures or services, to identify areas of cost inefficiency. or to perform long-term case.

16-Sep-97 3:00 PM

Dr. Mark Brinker, Houston Orthopedic Surgeon - Articles

An Analysis of the actual cost of Tibial Nonunions

The Journal of the Louisiana State, Vol. 149, June 1997

Author: Richard Beaver, BA; Mark R. Brinker, MD; Robert L. Barrack, MD